fbpx

FULLY CONTAINED COMMUNITIES and WHY WE SHOULD BE WORRIED ABOUT THEM

Issaquah Highlands FCC map provide by Google
Issaquah Highlands Maps by Google

By Margery Hite

On May 11, 2021, despite over 700 public comments urging them not to do it, the Skagit County Commissioners unanimously voted to docket a comprehensive plan amendment proposal to allow FCCs or “Fully Contained Communities”. By “docketing” the proposal, the County Commissioners prepared a path for developers to turn sections of rural Skagit County into massive housing enclaves.

What is going on?

First, some explanation of terms:

Comprehensive Plan – This is the County policy document that determines what kinds of land uses can take place in our county.   Also known as the “comp plan”, this lengthy and convoluted document determines to what extent industrial uses, commercial uses, farming, rural, and residential uses are allowed.  Together with the “comp plan map”, the comp plan describes broadly the places and intensity of uses that are acceptable under County law.  It applies to unincorporated Skagit County lands – not to cities and towns.

Development Regulations –  These are the specific rules for land uses allowed under the comprehensive plan.  Zoning rules are a type of Development Regulation, for example.  The Development Regulations are codified in the Skagit County Code.

Docket – Under the Growth Management Act (GMA), counties may only amend their comp plans once a year so that all the comp plan amendments are considered and adopted at the same time.  According to County procedures, before the Commissioners can adopt a comp plan amendment, they must decide to “docket” the proposal.  Docketing was the necessary first step towards allowing a new form of urban growth in Skagit County. 

Fully Contained Community (FCC) –  Simply put, an FCC is a housing development, designed and constructed by private developers, made up of hundreds or even thousands of houses and apartments with supporting commercial building space, in what is now the countryside. In addition, unlike the urban growth areas that we have in Skagit County today, an FCC is not part of a city or town. It is designed by private developers, with a phased build-out, to look like a city without a corresponding government to provide police, fire, road repair, drainage upgrades, or any of the maintenance and repair services that make a city livable. Without city government, the burden of providing those services will fall to Skagit County taxpayers. To the eye, an FCC looks like a huge subdivision.  And it is planned to be constructed in areas which are now rural in character and zoning.

How is this happening? 

Most people’s eyes glaze over when they hear talk of the comprehensive plan.  However, the comp plan is central because it is the body of policies that determine how land can be used outside of the cities and towns. In order to build an FCC in Skagit County, the developers need a new policy in the comp plan, since the comp plan does not presently authorize such a land use; lands presently designated as “rural” could not be used for massive housing projects without this comp plan amendment.  Adopting the comp plan amendment is necessary before FCCs could be built and turn Skagit County into a string of suburbs.

As County officials keep saying, this is not a project proposal so we don’t know the exact contours of the proposed development.  This makes it particularly difficult to bring the ramifications of the comp plan amendment to public attention – it is just a policy.  We don’t have a specific site and design to actually assess.  But that doesn’t make the proposed comprehensive plan amendment less important – it would allow such an enormous development anywhere in rural Skagit County, so long as it meets the requirements for such a project (requirements to be developed later).

While there isn’t a specific project before the County Commissioners, we do know that the FCC proposal assumes a population of roughly 3,500 people to be housed in an FCC.   For comparison purposes, we can note that La Conner has a population of just under 1,000 people; Concrete has 860 people.  The proposed FCC would house 3.5 times the population of La Conner, or four times the population of Concrete.    Instead of absorbing new population growth in existing cities and towns, the FCC would create a whole new urban area in the middle of the countryside. 

If the County Commissioners adopt the comp plan amendment, they will have made the decision to allow FCCs in the Skagit countryside.  The issue will not be if they are allowed but how and where they will be designed and constructed.   In addition, a new FCC could be permitted every five years.

After the comprehensive plan process, what comes next? 

The County officials have stated that they will create the development regulations after the comp plan amendment has been adopted.   Development regulations are the rules that will determine how FCCs may be built.  Because an FCC is an enormous project, these rules will cover many topics:  types of housing, height of apartment buildings (8 story apartment buildings are suggested in the developers’ proposal), roads, water and sewer utilities, drainage, commercial buildings (such as stores and offices), transportation/transit (parking and bus routes). 

Because the FCC will be built as a private project, if the project application meets the rules that have been adopted by the County, then it must be allowed to proceed under those rules.

It is critical to recognize that once these rules are adopted, an application to build an FCC will vest to those rules.  Vesting is part of Washington law and guarantees that a private person gets the benefit of the land use regulations that were in effect at the time their completed land use application was submitted for approval to local government.

For an individual house or building, this rule seems like a fair way of balancing the rights of the property owner against the authority of local government.  The property owner follows the rules in submitting an application and gets the right to do what the rules allowed, even if the local government made a mistake and should have changed the rules for important reasons of public concern.   As an example, imagine that the building code in effect at the time of the proposed remodeling permit allowed small staircases.  You get your permit to build a small staircase and then the County realizes that small staircases are not safe.   The County changes its building code to require deeper stairs and shorter rises, but you still get to build your small staircase  – because that was allowed when you submitted your permit application.

However, an FCC is by definition a project for hundreds even thousands of housing units, roads, drainage, parking, commercial buildings, apartments – all covering hundreds of acres of once rural land and possibly two decades of building.  So if that project vests to the regulations in effect at the time the application is submitted, the County cannot change the permission to build an enormous number of houses and apartments – even if it becomes apparent that allowing it was a really bad idea.

State law does not require counties to allow FCCs – they are a matter of local choice.

The FCC proposal is not required by the GMA. Further, it is not an idea initiated by the citizens of Skagit County.  If asked, most people do not even know it is before the County Commissioners for action.  Instead, it is being  pushed through the process by a Bellingham-based development group while we are still in the middle of a pandemic. This raises the question of why such a drastic change in the character of Skagit County is necessary now.  The benefit to our local community should be clear, and public agreement should be widespread before such a decision is reached.  In fact, the local benefit is not clear and there is not widespread agreement that FCCs are necessary.

One thing is clear.  Developers are going to make a lot of money if FCCs are allowed in Skagit County.  With new housing prices in Seattle currently averaging over $800,000, a new house in the lovely countryside for $600,000 or even $650,000 would be a bargain.  Housing prices are skyrocketing all over the country and there can be no doubt that the proposed houses will sell – most likely many of them to commuters pushed out of the Seattle and Snohomish County housing markets.  

Why We Should Be Worried

FCCs would turn our county from rural to suburban – and there will be no going back.  If this is a future we don’t want, action by Skagitonians is needed immediately.  Only public opinion stop adoption of the comprehensive plan amendment which would allow FCCs.  To prevent Skagit County from becoming another in a long chain of suburbs of Seattle, we must let the County Commissioners know: the people of our county want population growth to be housed in vibrant cities and towns so that our farms can thrive, our forests can flourish, and rural lifestyles can continue to enrich our county community.  No FCCs.

Margery Hite, a retired lawyer, served as a lawyer to county and city governments. She also served as the attorney member on a state growth management hearings board, and as an executive director for Snohomish County. She is now retired to a small farm in Bow where she raises dairy sheep and makes her own cheese. The above article consists of opinions of the author and is not intended nor should it be taken as legal advice.

12 thoughts on “FULLY CONTAINED COMMUNITIES and WHY WE SHOULD BE WORRIED ABOUT THEM

  1. Excellent article, thank-you so much for so clearly defining the issue and it’s impact. The Mount Baker Group of the Sierra Club and others are actively involved in trying to prevent Skagit County from falling victim to urban sprawl creep from the Seattle megalopolis. https://www.Sierra club.org/Washington/mount-baker-Whatcom-Skagit-San Juan

  2. This really needs to be seen by every person who lives in Skagit County. Not sure how to go about that.

  3. I think it important to add some Commissioners’ names, email & phone numbers; plus, any timely & urgent dates to stay ahead of the developers game plans.
    We all know that growth as a Seattle suburb was not in our original Comp Plan.

    1. Good thought Mick. Here is the contact information for the County Commissioners. Regarding the timing, we should act sooner than later as the process is underway already. Advertized public comment periods come late in the game.

      County Commissioners’ Office
      1800 Continental Place, Suite 100
      Mount Vernon, WA 98273
      Phone: (360) 416-1300

      Ron Wesen
      District 1
      ronw@co.skagit.wa.us

      Peter Browning
      District 2
      pbrowning@co.skagit.wa.us

      Lisa Janicki
      District 3
      ljanicki@co.skagit.wa.us

    2. HOW do they justify WATER to 3500 people crammed into small-lot housing when 1 family isn’t allowed a well on 20 acres because of low-flow??? County public water comes from the same feeder streams that would provide well water in the hills.
      People (including myself) have left urban sprawl to get away from it!! Don’t allow it up here – and all the undesirable elements that come with!

  4. Well there’s a Janiki involved and it seems like anytime a Janiki is involved they always get what they want! This is total insanity!! I noticed there’s no mention in the article about what a burden that will present on our school system, hospital systems, unless of course they’re going to build their own hospital and their own school etc etc which I highly doubt. So you know it’s going to be a homeowners/property taxpayers that are going to get screwed the worst!

  5. This could be a really good answer to the housing shortage. Nothing is set in stone on this and could be tailored to fit our county to help, not hurt.

    The article is well written, however with a bias against much needed development. If you read the article closely, it spells out there are many factors that are yet to be determined, that will be determined by county officials with the guidance of residence. That means we can direct the county to make sure any Fully Contained Community that may be built, is built with low income housing available. This could be a really good thing for our county. If you are worried about farm land, wouldn’t you rather have ten units built in one space instead of ten units built in ten spaces?

    The author did use the Issaquah Highlands project as an example in this take a look at this project. It had some changes done to it during the long process and it turned very well with a new school and hospital.

    1. George
      I moved to Skagit county 30 years ago to get away from urban sprawl that happened in my little hometown in Southern California where every day life was taken away as good honest people were forced to move out of their hometown because of urban sprawl. You’re an absolute fool if you think this will not change the country hometown feel we all appreciate about Skagit county. We have already lost too much ground . You are part of the minority who is running the country right now. We will not tolerate it any longer. We will be forcing the hand of our commissioners to stand down on policies like this FCC. Chuck wagoner…

    2. I agree more low and moderate income housing needs to be built in Skagit. I just don’t think we should destroy the rural countryside to do it. Our already-established Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) have enough space to accommodate adequate affordable housing. So why hasn’t it been built? That’s easy. Developers virtually never build low or moderate income housing without the government paying them to do it. Their bread is buttered by luxury housing. I think it makes more sense for county government to work with our towns and cities to figure out how to help pay for affordable housing rather than paving over the Skagit countryside.

  6. I am not sure if anyone has payed attention to the Smokey Point area.
    This a perfect example of what could happen. The influx of high density housing has destroyed that area. One of the main reasons we moved this direction.
    Even though they built new schools , they were outdated before they were done. Traffic is terrible. Now they have a Amazon center going on.
    The thought of this going through in Skagit county really scares me.
    It will be a major overload on every aspect on our infrastructure and way of life that everyone hear holds dear.
    We need to speak up and stand up to get the attention of the commissioners
    To listen to the people that voted them in. Remember they are supposed to be working for us.

    1. Maybe you haven’t heard, we also have an Amazon fulfillment center being built at the Port of Skagit.
      This is really disturbing to me, Amazon is everywhere!

  7. I think we should be fearful of Skagit Partners LLC, who are these people? From what I could dig up Bill Sygitowiez , the main man, is from Bellingham. Why the name Skagit Partners, because he wants to partner with Skagit County, haha! This man certainly has his act together to win over our commissioners. In his 40 page FCC proposal to amend the comprehensive plan, he has stated all the right things that are needed for the GMA. He has done his research on the Skagit County situation. I even found where he had his lawyer attend the Anacortes council meeting to try to get them on board with the commissioners to change the code for FCC. Really slick!
    It was stated at that meeting that he did not expect support from Mt Vernon or Sedro-Woolley. I’m surprised to learn that Burlington is on board for such a development with the impact to the schools etc.
    The commissioners certainly didn’t pay attention to our concerns with the planning commission appointee, will they listen to these concerns?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *